Popular Posts Today

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Panda dung, robot undergrads, and the world's wackiest tech awards

Written By Emdua on Kamis, 20 September 2012 | 08.49

By Michael Fitzpatrick, contributor

FORTUNE -- If you ever wondered if artificial breasts can survive scalding hot springs, whether panda dung will dissolve garbage, and if a robot could enter university, then Japan would be the to satisfy your curiosity.

Such esoteric research is meat and drink to certain branches of the $130 billion research and development industry here. To which, when the annual Ig Noble prizes are presented at Harvard today, its organizer Marc Abrahams will give silent thanks. He couldn't do without them, he says. "Japan has been putting up stuff for so long it's hard to miss," he says hinting today will be another bumper year for Japan.

He refers to research that, while attempting to solve problems and drive industry, has achieved some crooked profundity while generating the added bonus of making people smile.

So far, in the prize's 22-year-history, two nations stand out amongst others in eligibility says Abrahams. "Japan and the UK both have consistently produced impressive numbers of Ig Nobel Prize winners," he says. "I think that's partly due to something the two cultures share. Most other countries punish their eccentrics. Japan and the UK, in contrast, are proud of their eccentrics."

MORE: Fear and loathing in Japan

That certainly might be true of Japan. For the people who transformed post-war penury into the world's number two economy -- often thanks to persistence and tinkerers' ingenuity -- offbeat inventors do have a special place in the heart of the nation's inspiration-seeking salarymen. Some popular TV here is devoted to lone inventors and their innovations that seemed quirky at the time but quickly become novel or breakthrough. Nintendo's (NTDOY) Wii or the Tamagotchi are two examples.

Noble prize winners (18 so far) are appreciated, too. Japan wants to produce 30 Nobel prize winners over the next 50 years. And in that quest spends more on R&D as part of gross national product than any other (3.47% of GNP compared to US 2.81% and China 1.55%). While Japan has the third largest budget globally for R&D and over 700,000 researchers.

Ironically it is this driven, earnest approach to innovation that ingenuously sparks a fair bit of unconventional research, and the unintentionally funny. "I think the reason why we have a disproportion (of Japanese Ig Noble winners) is the strict matter-of-fact-ness of Japanese researcher," points out Masataka Watanabe, chief science promoter for one of Japan's great centers of innovation -- Tsukuba University.

"Such a paradox is caused by Marc Abraham's sense of humor. Japanese laureates don't see their research as funny. But Marc has found funny things in them." This admission to a sense-of-the-absurd-failure might be closer to the truth in the land where irony is as rare as a Zen barbecue.

The Japanese have so far romped 15 Ig Noble prizes after 22 years of roping in actual Noble prize winners to give out the tounge-placed-firmly-in-cheek awards, which like the real Nobles are divided into categories including Peace, Biology, and Physics. As a type of invention's homage to the god of unintended consequences, Daisuke Inoue's 2004 Peace prize for inventing karaoke and "providing an entirely new way for people to learn to tolerate each other," was apt.

MORE: Welcome to the 'Republic of Fakes'

Japanese scientists have done particularly well in chemistry. Unknowing his research into why birds, literally, gave a miss to a metal statue in his local park would induce mirth worldwide, Yukio Hirose, a metallurgist at Kanazawa University, now sees the joke and gratefully received his prize in 2003. "The Japanese selected have been good sports for the most part," says Abrahams. "There were some who would not take part…" but he is quick to draw a veil over the details.

Some reveled especially in the media spotlight. The prize winner for that has to be "the one and only" Dr. NakaMats says Abrahams. "He is, above all, the Wizard of Oz." Modestly claiming to have invented the floppy disk, the fax and have patented over 3,000 other inventions beside, Dr. NakaMats, whose real name is Yoshiro Nakamatsu, is in a class of his own when it comes to Ig noble prize winners. In 2005 the 84-year-old won the Nutrition prize for photographing and analyzing every meal had eaten over 34 years.

He is better known in Japan as the country's favorite eccentric boffin who gets his ideas "while 0.5 seconds from death" holding his breath underwater. There is, he says, much method in his madness and the genius of Japanese invention. "There are many innovators in Japan. Because we are very poor in natural resources so we must use our intelligence and human resources," he explains.

Nakamatsu is now busy trying to save ourselves from ourselves as he watches humanity flail around fretting over energy. To such ends he claims he has invented an air-conditioner that uses just 1% of energy used by conventional units. Verifiable or not we need people like Dr. NakaMats to, as the Ig Nobles put it, "make people laugh, and then make them think."

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/r7vAdGqiUcE/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
08.49 | 0 komentar | Read More

Occupy activists join iPhone 5 queue

Peaceful protest? Photo: Jessica Mellow

FORTUNE -- Looks like the launch of the iPhone 5 is about to get political.

Veteran line-sitter Jessica Mellow, who's been camping out in front of the big glass cube of Apple's (AAPL) Fifth Avenue store since last Thursday, reports that at 10 p.m. Wednesday  -- a day and a half before the Friday morning launch of the iPhone 5 -- a contingent of activists from the Occupy Wall Street movement showed up and began settling in for the night.

"They took about 20 spots, and they have nicer sleeping bags than we do," she says. "I hear there are more on the way. All I know is that they are planning some sort of (peaceful) protest. They want to put up tents but I don't think they will be allowed. And they are protesting Foxconn and slave labor in China."

We're going to have to check it out.

See also: iPhone 5: Customers in the Big Apple camp out 8 days early.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/b0j1OZNs5pc/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.20 | 0 komentar | Read More

IBM's Ginni Rometty looks ahead

By Jessi Hempel, senior writer

FORTUNE -- Ginni Rometty's first customer conference as CEO of IBM (IBM) was an unusual affair, especially by Big Blue's buttoned-up standards. The June confab took place in an airy loft in Manhattan's hip Chelsea neighborhood. When the tiny elevator arrived to whisk a group of us to the meeting space, the doors opened and there was Rometty, flanked by a couple of visibly nervous assistants. "Really good to see you!" she said, clasping my hand warmly as her handlers checked their watches. The presentation was about to begin and Rometty still wasn't wearing her microphone. "Isn't this neat?" she asked.

The program started late. At 5-foot-11, with blond hair tucked behind a headband, Rometty, 55, has an almost regal bearing, but on this day she flubbed her entrance, bounding onto the stage before she could be introduced. She laughed it off. When an audience member's ringing cellphone interrupted the events, she joked, "I hope that isn't mine!"

You wouldn't catch Lou Gerstner or Sam Palmisano trying to smooth over someone else's faux pas. Rometty's two predecessors also are unlikely to have hosted a sales meeting in a loft, and they definitely wouldn't have described the proceedings as "neat." But they surely would have approved of Rometty's agenda that June day. She had assembled some familiar faces, the chief information officers who buy billions of dollars of software, tech services, and hardware from IBM (No. 19 on the Fortune 500), but she had also invited their chief marketing officers. (Thus the trendy venue.) Her ambitious -- and yes, unusual -- plan: Get the marketers to use IBM tools to sort their data for nuggets that will help them better reach customers and sell more stuff.

MORE: Ginni Rometty - No. 1 Most Powerful Women in Business

When Rometty (pronounced RAH-metty) became IBM's ninth CEO -- and its first woman chief executive -- she took control of the 19th-largest company in the world by revenue (2011 sales surpassed $107 billion) and, at presstime, the fifth largest by valuation, with a market cap of $235 billion. Her influence on the world of technology and her company's impact on the financial markets earn her the No. 1 spot in Fortune's annual ranking of the Most Powerful Women in Business. She inherits a company with an enviable growth record for its enormous size. Over the past decade, the company has increased profits by an average 16% every year, returning 12% annually to shareholders.

She also needs to live up to almost ridiculously high expectations: IBM has said it will add $20 billion more in revenue growth in the next three years. To put that in perspective, that's a business roughly the size of Nike (NKE), No. 136 on the Fortune 500.

Not that any of this is a surprise to Rometty, a 31-year veteran of IBM who is known to have thick binders of background material and data prepared for her in advance of meetings. Indeed, the most surprising thing about her June customer debut was how loose and improvisational it was. She's not a stiff -- "There's nothing imperious or imperial about her," notes Harvard Business School's Rosabeth Moss Kanter -- but Rometty rarely leaves anything to chance. For example, she declined to be interviewed in person for this article, and would answer questions only via e-mail.

Rometty was at Palmisano's side for much of his decade-long tenure, and became a serious candidate to succeed him about four years ago. And she was personally involved in setting the high bar that she must now clear. She and other senior leaders helped him develop the five-year plan -- dubbed "2015 Roadmap" -- that has IBM targeting more than $125 billion in revenue that year.

For Rometty the challenge of meeting that goal is only partly about inventing new technologies to sell to her existing clients. Growth at IBM's scale also means creating new markets, much the way it did with its Smarter Planet campaign, which sold nontechies such as mayors and police chiefs on the idea of using software to monitor and manage traffic, water systems, and sanitation trucks. Now Rometty is making a similar pitch to marketing executives, promising that technology will change the way they do their jobs. It won't be an easy sell: Marketers are less apt than bureaucrats to be wowed by a charismatic CEO or statistics about petabytes. Many are accustomed to seeing computing as a tool to support their creative endeavors, not the starting point.

The rising star (from left): featured in the IBM 2000 annual report; at an IBM facility in 2002; talking with clients at the CIO-CMO event in June

The rising star (from left): featured in the IBM 2000 annual report; at an IBM facility in 2002; talking with clients at the CIO-CMO event in June

But if she can pull it off, Rometty could initially help change the way corporations communicate with their customers -- and ultimately the way they use technology to build and sell their products. "This is a mindset shift, not a market shift," Rometty explained to the CMOs at the Manhattan event. "It changes everything." She was talking about her customers, but she could just as easily have been talking about IBM.

Rometty had always been a top performer, but she caught the eye of executives at headquarters in Armonk, N.Y., in 2002 when she managed the integration of IBM's $3.5 billion purchase of PricewaterhouseCoopers' IT consulting business. As general manager for IBM's global services division -- the unit that had been at the heart of Gerstner's now legendary resuscitation of the company -- Rometty pushed early for the acquisition and helped negotiate the deal. Overnight IBM became the world's largest consulting business. And then Rometty had to figure out how to integrate 30,000 PwC consultants into her group of 150,000 IBMers.

It was a mishmash of cultures that could have gone horribly wrong, but Rometty managed the integration with a particular sensitivity to its impact on employees. IBM was buying talent, after all. The acquisition wouldn't be successful unless Rometty persuaded the consultants, particularly the 1,000 or so incoming PwC partners, to stick around. She began planning for how the two cultures would fit together even before the dealmakers set financial terms. It was particularly challenging to navigate differing compensation packages. To bring salaries in line with IBM peers', some of PwC's top executive partners had to take as much as a 40% cut in cash compensation -- and forgo perks like club memberships. To make up for the cash reductions, Rometty negotiated stock options that motivated the new employees to stay for at least four years. Ultimately, top performers could earn a higher payout.

She also reached out to all PwC employees personally. The morning the acquisition was announced, they arrived to the blinking red light of a voicemail notification on their phones. "Got to admit feelings were mixed," wrote Tereza Nemessanyi, then a principal consultant at PwC, on her blog. "As a creative type, I was nervous of what I knew as a very rigid culture." The following two-minute message welcomed her personally to IBM, assured her that IBM would retain the best elements of the PwC culture, and most important, got her excited. "Jeez, that woman leaves some seriously good voicemail," wrote Nemessanyi, who tells me she was tempted to move to IBM but ended up staying with PwC's parent.

MORE: Big Blue's big brass - 9 IBM CEOs

This personal approach to leadership is the quality that resonates most with IBMers who have worked for Rometty. It's one reason she has been able to keep talented, entrepreneurial employees like Manoj Saxena, a general manager in charge of commercializing the Watson technologies. A serial entrepreneur, Saxena arrived at IBM in 2006 after the company purchased Webify, his business-to-business software startup. "At first my venture capitalist friends were taking bets on how many quarters I'd stay," he says. Rometty promised Saxena more resources and the opportunity to have a bigger impact at IBM, but she sold Saxena on the company a few years ago when he had a health issue. By that time Rometty was managing several hundred thousand people, but she regularly dropped him a personal e-mail to see how he was feeling. "She leads from both her head and her heart," Saxena says.

Customers get head and heart too. Nick Donofrio, who worked closely with Rometty before his retirement from IBM in 2008, remembers helping her address the concerns of a large Midwestern client sometime around 2005. The client had installed some new IBM products that weren't working well. Rometty called Donofrio, who was then executive vice president of innovation and technology, and told him they had to fly out immediately to see the client in person. The pair spent a day working closely with the client to get the project on track. But a day after they got back to New York, the client's system wasn't working again. Rometty insisted they fly out a second time to help the client fix the problem. "Most people wouldn't go twice," said Donofrio. "They'd send a junior person." As it turned out, it wasn't entirely IBM's fault -- the client hadn't followed instructions. But Rometty said nothing. "Ginni's not thinking, Did we do it wrong?" says Donofrio. "That's not where her head is. She's thinking about the client's success." (Perhaps tellingly, Rometty says she doesn't recall this particular example.) The customer, says Donofrio, has become an even larger customer.

IBM is constantly restructuring its workforce, and the coming changes are sure to test Rometty's leadership style. As IBM becomes more global, it will continue to bolster its ranks internationally, leaving the U.S. (an estimated 105,000 employees today) with a smaller number of workers -- mostly researchers, executives who focus on sales and marketing, and talent coming from startup acquisitions. For many current employees -- some of whom already feel taxed by the long hours and penny-pinching that IBM demands -- the process will be wrenching: They'll need to either reinvent themselves, or more likely, move on. And unlike when she was running global services, Rometty won't be able to leave them all a voicemail.

Rometty, 55, caught the eye of her bosses by successfully integrating PwC's consulting business in 2002.

Rometty, 55, caught the eye of her bosses by successfully integrating PwC's consulting business in 2002.

The former Virginia Nicosia is the oldest of four children raised by a single mom outside Chicago. Her mother, with whom she remains very close, was among her strongest influences. By the time she arrived at Northwestern University in 1975, Rometty had matured into a striking, intelligent student who was popular among her peers and successful in the classroom. She pledged the elite sorority Kappa Kappa Gamma, and her pledge mom, Erin McInerney, remembers they connected in part because both came from modest backgrounds. "Unlike most of the other girls, we'd had summer jobs and were on scholarships and had loans," she said. By senior year, Rometty was sorority president.

While many of her classmates studied the arts, Rometty was one of just a few of women to study computer science. In the late '70s, Northwestern's sole academic computer was so large that the university dedicated an entire building, the Vogelbach Computing Center, to housing it. Rometty and her fellow students learned to program it using punch cards. When Rometty needed help on an assignment, a KKG sister coaxed a fellow student named Craig Berman into tutoring her in exchange for dinner at the sorority house -- probably the only place on campus where students were served meals on tablecloths. One Sunday morning Nicosia appeared in Berman's fourth-floor dorm room, "a statuesque blond" who "kicked aside some dirty clothes stacked near the doorway." She had a list of written questions and programming issues, and when he tried to answer the questions, she pushed him instead to explain his method for reaching the solution. "A lot of people look like they are listening, but she really listened," he says.

Berman, who is now a vice president at Jeffries & Co. (JEF), describes his classmate as quiet, focused, always early, and organized. "If she fell off the sidewalk and into the lake, she would have come out wearing a scuba suit," he says. And she had good advice as well. A professor once marked Berman's homework incorrectly. In class he had an opportunity to show the professor up, proving he had the right answer. When he raised his hand, Rometty shoved it down, whispering, "You'll win your argument in private later or lose it in public now."

Rometty graduated in 1979 with a bachelor of science degree with high honors in computer science and electrical engineering. She had attended Northwestern on a scholarship from General Motors (GM), where she had interned between her junior and senior years, and she moved to Detroit to work for the automaker after graduation. There she met her husband, Mark Rometty, now an oil futures investor. The pair, who do not have children, enjoy scuba diving (as a matter of fact) and the occasional Broadway show together, as well as golfing near their Bonita Springs, Fla., home. (Rometty stays in a hotel-run condo in Westchester County when she is in New York.)

MORE: Interactive - investing in the Most Powerful Women

She credits her husband with being a great support to her. She describes a moment early in her career when her boss asked if she'd like to take a big promotion. She told her manager she didn't feel ready, and asked for the night to think about it. At home she discussed it with her husband. "He just looked at me, and he said, 'Do you think a man would have ever answered that question that way?' " Rometty took the promotion.

In 1981, Rometty took a job in IBM's Detroit office as a systems engineer -- a technical consultant of sorts -- for banking customers. In the decades that followed, she moved up through a series of sales and management jobs, working with clients in all of IBM's most important industries -- banking, insurance, telecommunications, manufacturing, and health care. Before moving into senior management, Rometty spent the '90s working in sales, a job for which her tech prowess and people skills made her uniquely qualified. Salespeople who met their annual sales quotas received commemorative pins and luxurious weekend getaways as a reward for earning membership in the prestigious 100% club. Rometty never missed a year.

Three weeks before Rometty was named CEO last fall, we sat together for an onstage conversation at Fortune's annual Most Powerful Women Summit. By then speculation had begun that IBM would soon announce her promotion. I asked her what she'd learned from Palmisano. Rometty reflected. "What he always says is, 'Nothing is inevitable.' " She went on to explain, "Whatever business you're in -- it doesn't matter -- it's going to commoditize over time. It's going to devalue. You've got to keep moving it to a higher value."

To put it another way, Rometty learned that IBM must keep evolving. There is always a new shift coming in technology, and if she doesn't help IBM become the first to discover and commercialize it, the company will lose its shirt.

It's sage advice that came through experience. The company is still haunted by the near-death experience of the early '90s, when it missed the technology shift to personal computers and came within a quarter of going bankrupt. Palmisano was the first CEO to step into the role after Gerstner turned the company around -- and he responded by making bold research-based decisions about the future of the business, and enforcing maniacal discipline over how those decisions were carried out. Perhaps most important, and somewhat unusual for contemporary corporate culture, he nurtured a consistent team of senior executives -- mostly IBM lifers -- with very little turnover.

Rometty (from left): watching the Masters golf tournament in Augusta, Ga., in April; giving a speech in Beijing last year; with businessman David Koch at the Time 100 Gala this year

Rometty (from left): watching the Masters golf tournament in Augusta, Ga., in April; giving a speech in Beijing last year; with businessman David Koch at the Time 100 Gala this year

IBM likes its leaders to keep a low profile, preferring a ruthless focus on customers to coverage in the press. Earlier this year when the all-male Augusta National Golf Club, which has historically offered membership to CEOs of companies like IBM that sponsor the event, did not offer Rometty a membership, she kept mum about the affair, even as the snub ignited a media firestorm. Though she hasn't explained herself, one gets the sense that her greatest contribution to feminism won't be helped by speaking out on issues so much as making IBM successful. She has a company to run.

So in keeping with IBM's traditional long-term approach to management, Rometty has been fulfilling the goals she helped her predecessor draft in IBM's 2015 Roadmap. To hit the massive $20 billion goal, Rometty has spelled out four high-growth areas for the company to focus on. It will continue the Smarter Planet work, in which it infuses the traditional systems that make our towns and cities work with new forms of computing. Revenue from this initiative jumped 50% last year as IBM began to attach the word "smarter" to new market categories like cities and commerce. The company will also invest in helping companies adopt aspects of cloud computing, and it will supercharge its work in business analytics. Rometty will spend a good deal of her time personally nursing along deals in growth markets, which are expected to provide up to 30% of IBM's revenue by 2015.

To that end, Rometty has been crisscrossing the globe since January. She set an early goal for herself of meeting 100 client CEOs in her first two months, and she quickly surpassed it. In April she traveled to Brazil to spend nearly a week hammering out the details of her first big CEO transaction, a deal with the energy business magnate Eike Batista, who calls her "transparent and straightforward." IBM will take over the IT operations for Batista's EBX Group in a contract that is estimated to be worth $1 billion over the next decade, and it will buy a 20% stake in an EBX subsidiary that provides tech services to industries like mining, energy, and shipbuilding.

MORE: What does power really mean?

As much as Rometty is acting on the strategy Palmisano laid out, she has put her own signature on the company as well. One big challenge with which IBM struggles is its reputation for being slow to execute projects, which are sometimes lumbered by layers of bureaucracy. So Rometty is attempting a fix. IBM's most senior executives have long served on three teams -- operating, technology, and strategy -- to help guide the company. Rometty created a fourth leadership team, the Client Experience Team, which she chairs. There are no senior executives on the team. Rather, she appointed a series of client-facing executives to meet with her once a month. They bring in other business leaders -- recently they hosted Ritz-Carlton chief sales and marketing officer Chris Gabaldon -- to hear how other companies manage customer relationships. Rometty says it's not about "clearing away roadblocks" so much as creating the "signature IBM relationship." IBM hopes it will help the company's reputation with customers as well.

As Rometty marches the company into IBM's second century, technology is again shifting. Rometty says we are entering the "cognitive era" of computing. History has produced only three computing eras so far, she explains. The first encompassed machines that counted and tabulated -- the calculators and punch-card machines that Thomas Watson first manufactured. The second era, which began in 1960, brought programmable computers to market. "Everything you know today -- the iPad in front of you -- is just programmable," Rometty told the audience at that first customer conference. What comes next? "This era is machines that learn."

The best example of this is IBM's Watson supercomputer, which soundly defeated the two men holding the longest Jeopardy! winning streaks. The computer system understands natural language. It can generate hypotheses, recognizing that there are different statistical probabilities for each outcome. And it learns as it goes along, refining its responses. When Rometty talks about the cognitive era of computing, that is what she means.

Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings competes against IBM's Watson supercomputer.

Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings competes against IBM's Watson supercomputer.

Watson came from IBM's labs, where the company invests an average of $6 billion annually. Now IBM is unleashing Watson on the business world. Longtime IBM customer Lori Beer drove to Yorktown Heights, N.Y., to watch that final match live, and that's where she first met Rometty. Beer, an EVP who oversees tech purchases for health insurer WellPoint (WLP), thought maybe Watson could be useful. She visited IBM Research, and Rometty made several visits to WellPoint. "She actually spent the time to get to know us," Beer says. "She really made sure she understood what the issues are."

By September 2011 the companies had hammered out a deal for WellPoint to use Watson's data crunching to help suggest treatment options and diagnoses to nurses and doctors. When presented with information about a new patient in the future, Watson will look for data on those with similar symptoms, as well as the treatments that have been most successful. It will provide a range of treatment options, going so far as to suggest how likely it is to be right about each selection. Less than a year after the contract was signed, the first pilots were rolled out in August with WellPoint nurses who manage complex patient cases and review treatment requests from medical providers. Meanwhile, Watson's computers are being put through a medical school of sorts, absorbing medical records and other data so that by the end of 2013 they can be deployed in oncology practices to help doctors treat cancer patients.

Rometty, of course, believes that Watson has great promise beyond medicine. That's why she had Beer speak at her first customer conference, the one that brought together technologists and marketers. The predictive nature of the technology could reinvent any company flooded with increasingly large amounts of data -- nowadays basically every business in every industry. But first, Rometty will have to translate the idea to a host of new customers who never fancied themselves all that technically minded. And like the eight men who have run this iconic company before her, she'll have to sell them on it.

This story is from the October 8, 2012 issue of Fortune.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/uUnfYNEQdP8/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
05.19 | 0 komentar | Read More

Inside Salesforce's major transformation

FORTUNE -- Salesforce has long been known for its cloud-based customer relationship management software for salespeople. That's why, after all, its ticker symbol is CRM.  But during a lengthy keynote speech at the company's annual Dreamforce conference on Wednesday, CEO Marc Benioff unveiled a slew of new products he hopes will be snapped up by HR and marketing teams, among other business groups.

Much of the new software is the product of recent acquisitions. Take Work.com, a feedback and performance review tool that was started by a small company called Rypple, which Salesforce acquired late last year. San Francisco-based Salesforce says Work.com will "liberate performance management from a top-down, once-a-year process into an integrated daily solution that makes a meaningful impact on business performance."

How exactly? By putting feedback and rewards capabilities within apps that employees and managers use regularly. (Of course, its success will at least partly depend on the company's ability to build Work.com into all sorts of apps, not just those made by Salesforce). Salesforce also announced the Marketing Cloud, which helps companies track and manage social media activity and is a combination of technology from recent acquisitions like Buddy Media and Radian6.

MORE: Intel wants to reinvent computing--again

Branching out from its core product isn't an option for Salesforce -- it's a necessity for the company to keep growing and keep investors happy, not to mention stave off increasing competition from larger enterprise players who are entering the cloud-based software space. At last year's Dreamforce Benioff pushed Chatter, his "Facebook for the enterprise." But it's clear Salesforce is ramping up its efforts to expand, and is making the necessary acquisitions to accelerate the process.

Of course, new products bring new competitors, and even though Salesforce has made a name for itself as the cloud-based CRM vendor, it's new to the hotly contested, so-called "human capital management" set of software tools used by HR departments. Meanwhile, large, traditional enterprise software companies like SAP (SAP) and Oracle (ORCL) have thrown billions -- not just millions -- of dollars on similar acquisitions.

There are also plenty of smaller, nimble competitors that Salesforce will be up against with Chatterbox, yet another new product that was officially announced this week. Chatterbox will allow customers to manage and share business files -- it's no surprise Salesforce is calling it the "Dropbox for the Enterprise." Several other players have already made headway in the file sharing business, like Box, which says it is being used in 120,000 companies (customers include AARP, Red Bull and P&G).

MORE: Can the Lumia smartphone save Nokia?

So what's next for Salesforce? Expect the company to expand its HR offerings with recruitment tools and other software. And expect more acquisitions and more attempts to push itself as a platform for developers, not just an application provider. Oh, and you can also expect Dreamforce to continue to be one of the most over-the-top technology conferences out there. Salesforce pulled out all the stops for this year's 90,000 attendees -- both MC Hammer and the Red Hot Chili Peppers performed.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/k7W0wmKsUyE/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
04.20 | 0 komentar | Read More

HP and IBM: Two paths, one future

By Kevin Kelleher, contributor

FORTUNE -- On the face of it, Hewlett-Packard and IBM have a lot in common. Both are storied brands with rich legacies that shaped high-tech. Both are working with companies large and small to help manage their technology. Both are angling for a piece of the markets -- like cloud computing and big data -- that promise years of growth.

And both have new chief executive officers: Meg Whitman moved into HP's (HPQ) CEO office a year ago; Virginia Rometty took the reins at IBM (IBM) in January. Both companies share a similar vision for success. And both face similar challenges to get there, like a sluggish global economy and the rise of disruptive new technologies.

Despite this bedrock sameness, HP and IBM are pushing forward on different paths. HP is in the midst of a multi-year turnaround, while IBM is building on a long-term plan outlined years ago. Neither company's path was charted in large part by its current leader. Why? First, their views on the role of hardware versus software in the future of IT; and second, their approach to mergers and acquisitions.

IBM's last decade has been marked by steady leadership pursuing a long-term course. To move forward from its recent history as a maker of big computers, the company famously pushed into IT-consulting services and software, taking a step away from hardware in 2004 by selling the PC division to Lenovo for $1.75 billion.

MORE: What does power really mean to women?

Like IBM, HP saw years ago that the future of big tech was not in selling big computers to companies, but in taking on the increasingly complex tasks of managing them and all the antecedent technologies. But unlike IBM, HP maintained that hardware would continue to play a key role in its tech outsourcing business -- a bet the company made when it spent $25 billion for Compaq in 2002.

After Compaq, HP continued to grow. It went from a company that made $57 billion in revenue in 2002 to one that made $127 billion last year. By contrast, IBM grew relatively slowly -- from $81 billion in revenue in 2002 to $107 billion last year.

Over the past decade, HP has trumped IBM in revenue growth through its aggressive acquisitions. Under Mark Hurd's tenure, between 2006 and 2010, HP spent big on tech brand names like EDS ($13.9 billion), 3Com ($2.7 billion), Palm ($1.2 billion) and 3Par ($2.4 billion). Under Hurd's ill-starred successor Léo Apotheker, HP spent $1.6 billion on ArcSight and $11 billion on Autonomy, two software companies.

IBM, by contrast, has made many mergers and acquisitions since spinning off its PC division, but only once in that tine has it spent more than $2 billion -- for business software maker Cognos for $5 billion in 2008. Instead, it's made a handful of billion dollar deals in that time span: Internet Security Systems ($1.6 billion), data analytics firm Netezza ($1.7 billion), Sterling Commerce ($1.4 billion), and others.

MORE: IBM's Ginni Rometty looks ahead

But there is another aspect to the story. Ever since Lewis Platt stepped down as HP's CEO in 1999, the company has gone through seven different leaders, including two interim CEOs. That's as many CEOs as IBM has seen since Thomas Watson, Jr., retired from IBM in 1971.

The pace of CEO turnover can be crucial: While IBM has had the luxury of laying out five-year plans, HP has shifted from hardware execs Fiorina and Hurd to software exec Apotheker to e-commerce veteran Whitman. And those transitions -- or lack thereof -- have had a big impact on the two companies' strategies.

In other words, HP's M&A moves in the past decade chronicle the strategy of a tech giant pushing into hardware and software alike, a clear bet on a future that would rely on both. IBM, by contrast, saw its future more in the zeros and ones of software than the physical machinery of hardware.

HP paid big for its bets on hardware, wagering it would win out in the end. IBM, meanwhile, made lots of smaller bets on software, which has proven to be a cheaper business to start-up than hardware. That doesn't mean IBM won't pay out for acquisitions: The company has indicated it will spend $20 billion on deals through 2015 -- more than it has spent in the last 10 years.

MORE: Investing in the Most Powerful Women

What it means is IBM believes its big investments will be in software companies that are only starting to show their stuff. HP, of course, will also be looking for good software investments, but it wants to counterbalance them against some of the hardware companies that it bought over the past several years. It's a debate between pure software versus a mix of software and hardware.

HP's bet is risky because the world of tech is more and more driven by software. Hardware is and will always be an important component of tech, but in many areas -- personal computers, servers, switches and routers -- software is driving efficiencies and innovation. Hardware, while ever improving, is increasingly seen as more of a commodity business that delivers low margins.

Software, of course, has long been a high-margin business. Even though HP, through its years of acquisitions, has seen its revenue grow faster than IBM's, it is IBM that has enjoyed the bigger profits. Last year, IBM's operating profit was 27% of its revenue, versus an 8% margin for HP.

That's where IBM and HP stand today. The bigger question for their new CEO's is, where will these companies go? Where can their leaders take them?

Rometty has indicated she will build on the strategies set down by her predecessors, although she is willing to put a bold stamp on the company if that's what it needs. Whitman has been frank about the challenges facing HP, yet willing to make tough calls on its future. Whitman resisted demands from investors to spin-off HP's PC business. And this week, she reiterated her desire to make the company a player in the growing market for smartphones.

There is room for both companies to thrive, whenever the global economy finally improves. IBM will tell companies it's got the consulting, infrastructure and software expertise they need to push into the brave new era of tech. HP will say it offers the same, but it has the soup-to-nuts solution -- from consultants to apps to PCs and smartphones -- that's even more comprehensive. Both will battle other giants in the space, like Oracle (ORCL) and Dell (DELL).

Will both thrive? The financial markets measure a discrepancy. IBM is up 13% so far this year. HP is down 29%. IBM has a market cap of $236 billion. HP is valued at $36 billion, or less than a sixth of its rival's value.

But before you consider any of those statistics, consider the single metric that many people believe says more about a tech giant's future than anything. IBM has spent $18 billion in research and development over the last three years, or 6.0% of its revenue in that period. HP has spent $9 billion in the same period, or 2.5% of its revenue. To plan for the future may mean spending less on high-ticket acquisitions and more on research and development. As both companies steer toward a brighter tomorrow, that strategy seems one well worth betting on.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/dkXbCE9Ih88/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.56 | 0 komentar | Read More

Online poker exec pleads guilty in money laundering case

The U.S. operations of Pokerstars and Full Tilt were shuttered last year.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A former online poker executive has pleaded guilty to laundering illegal gambling proceeds for the popular gaming sites Pokerstars and Full Tilt Poker, federal officials announced Wednesday.

Nelson Burtnick, 41, admitted that while serving as director of payments first at Pokerstars and then at Full Tilt, he helped deceive banks into processing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of gambling transactions in violation of federal law, the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office said in a statement.

The U.S. operations of Pokerstars and Full Tilt were shuttered last year after the companies were indicted on charges of bank fraud and money laundering. In July, the Justice Department announced a $731 million settlement with the firms to resolve the allegations. Full Tilt also settled allegations that it had operated a Ponzi scheme, failing to maintain sufficient funds on deposit for players to withdraw.

Under the settlement, Full Tilt agreed to forfeit virtually of all its assets to the government, with Pokerstars agreeing to acquire them and to repay Full Tilt players still owed money.

Burtnick, a Canadian national and resident of Ireland, faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison. His attorneys declined to comment.

Five other defendants in the case have also pleaded guilty, with charges still pending against ex-Full Tilt CEO Raymond Bitar. To top of page

First Published: September 19, 2012: 4:56 PM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/MrmlWDw8Whg/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Groupon launches credit-card payments service

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Groupon is throwing down hard in the mobile payment space, with a guarantee that its new Payments service is "the lowest-cost option" for merchants who run a daily deal with the company.

Groupon Payments, which is available through an app for the company's merchants, is the latest entry in the white-hot mobile payments field. Groupon's rate is 1.8% plus 15 cents per swiped transaction for MasterCard (MA, Fortune 500), Visa (V, Fortune 500) and Discover (DFS, Fortune 500) cards. For American Express (AXP, Fortune 500), it's 3% plus 15 cents per transaction.

That's a pretty sweet deal for retailers. The swipe fees that credit cards typically charge can vary from one small business to another, but they usually fall between 2-4% of the transaction for credit cards (debit card rates are typically lower). Shares of Groupon (GRPN) were up more than 7% in midday trading after the announcement. The deal is available to U.S. merchants only, for now.

Can Groupon actually make money on this arrangement, or is it a loss-leader intended to grow the company's discounts business? The company isn't saying.

"I wouldn't comment on profit or loss. It doesn't make sense to do that. But I can say that we want to make a real business out of this," said Mihir Shah, Groupon's vice president of mobile and merchant products.

Groupon developed the idea for Payments, Shah said, after the company realized many merchants couldn't answer a simple question: What rate are you paying for transactions? The mission is "to slash the complexity and costs of accepting credit card payments" -- and Groupon is planning to roll out other services aimed at simplifying life for merchants, he said.

In some cases, Groupon Payments severely undercuts even low-cost competitors like Square. The startup, backed by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, lets small business swipe credit cards through a tiny device that attaches to a phone. Square offers two plans for businesses: pay one flat fee of $275 per month, or pay 2.75% per swipe. EBay (EBAY, Fortune 500)-owned PayPal charges 2.7% per swipe.

Square, which has raised more than $200 million in funding and is valued at more than $3.2 billion, is just one of the companies trying to lead the fast-growing mobile payments space. The list also includes Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), which is pushing its Wallet service, and financial services companies like VeriFone (PAY) and NCR (NCR, Fortune 500).

Though Groupon Payments is designed for businesses that run daily deals through the company, a temporary pilot program for non-Groupon merchants offers rates of 2.2% for most cards (3% for American Express) plus 15 cents per swipe. To top of page

First Published: September 19, 2012: 2:01 PM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/HaBJodpqDtc/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

The iPhone 5 may be Apple's last blowout U.S. bestseller

The iPhone 5 could be the best-selling U.S. phone of all time.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The iPhone 5 hasn't even hit stores yet and it's already blowing the doors off the competition. Apple pre-sold 2 million iPhone 5s in one day, setting a new smartphone record.

Industry analysts widely expect the iPhone 5 to be the bestselling mobile device of all time. Given the way Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) continues winning over consumers around the world, the iPhone 5's global record will probably last exactly one sales cycle, until the iPhone 6 is released.

In the United States, however, there's a reasonable chance that the iPhone 5 will hold the nation's smartphone sales record for much longer -- maybe forever. As the smartphone boom comes to an end and carriers make upgrades more expensive and onerous for their customers, the iPhone's popularity in the U.S. is likely to plateau.

The number of American smartphone subscribers is expected to reach nearly 140 million by the end of 2012, equal to 57% of wireless customers, according to Kevin Smithen, an analyst at Macquarie Securities. The percentage of wireless subscribers with a smartphone is on pace to eclipse the magic 70% threshold next year -- the level at which most telecommunications services, like cable and broadband, have historically begun to slow their rapid rise.

"The smartphone market, and particularly the iPhone market, will slow next year after very strong shipments of the next iPhone through year-end," Smithen predicts.

The U.S. smartphone upgrade rate has already begun to fall, thanks to a combination of factors. Innovation has slowed over the past couple years (the iPhone 5 has another row of apps!) and carriers have begun to make upgrades more expensive and less desirable (hello, "shared data" plans). After the iPhone 4S launch absolutely decimated carriers' profit margins, the networks made their upgrade policies more restrictive by raising activation fees, forcing customers to adopt tiered plans and lengthening the time customers need to stay under contract to become eligible for a new phone.

"These moves should result in fewer total upgrades ... than seen in prior launches," said Mike McCormack, analyst at Nomura Securities.

Related story: The iPhone 5 is coming ... will there be an iPhone 10?

Yes, the iPhone 5 will sell like crazy. But by the time the iPhone 6 comes around, the U.S. smartphone market will look very different.

The number of iPhone upgrades -- customers moving from one version of Apple's gadget to another -- nearly doubled in 2011 and is expected to double again in 2012 to roughly 20 million, according to Macquarie estimates. But the forecasts for iPhone upgrades after that show a flat line.

Most of Apple's iPhones get sold to brand-new customers. Last year, Apple newbies bought two-thirds of the 30 million iPhones sold in the U.S., Macquarie estimates.

Those numbers will start dropping as the pool of untapped iPhone customers willing to splurge on a new iPhone dries up. The iPhone represented 45% of all smartphone sales last year at the "Big Three" national carriers -- Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500), AT&T (T, Fortune 500) and Sprint (S, Fortune 500). Analysts at Macquarie, Nomura and other Wall Street firms expect that figure to rise significantly this year -- then level off.

"We do not believe that Apple can grow its market share at the Big Three beyond 70%, as we expect several new low-end smartphones from Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500), Huawei, LG, Nokia (NOK), Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) and Motorola in the new year as well as a Samsung Galaxy S4 at the high end," said Smithen.

As a result, Macquarie predicts that iPhone sales will top out at 46.3 million next year before falling to 45.5 million in 2014.

Of course, this is Apple we're talking about. The world's biggest tech company has repeatedly proved naysayers wrong. Thanks to Apple's reality distortion field and passionate groupies, the iPhone 6 and its successors could once again set new records in the United States.

"As long as there are Apple fanboys and fangirls, there will always be demand for the iPhone," says Ramon Llamas, analyst at IDC. "There's so much about the iPhone that people love and lust over, and Apple just kind of ropes you in. There's a lot to keep Apple's momentum going." To top of page

First Published: September 20, 2012: 5:42 AM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/sFJRcnxTQCA/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.18 | 0 komentar | Read More

Chase's website slowed by glitches

Written By Emdua on Rabu, 19 September 2012 | 15.35

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Chase's website was slow and unavailable for some users for several hours on Wednesday, one day after Bank of America experienced similar issues.

Around 1:40 p.m. ET on Wednesday, Chase's Twitter account tweeted: "Chase.com is experiencing intermittent issues. We're working to restore full connectivity & apologize for any inconvenience." Chase spokesman Patrick Linehan repeated a similar statement, and declined to comment further on the reason for the problems.

Monitoring firm Keynote says the trouble appeared to start around 12:15 pm ET and was mostly resolved by the late afternoon, although some sluggishness remained.

Chase's site issues broke out just as Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) was recovering from its own intermittent slowness. Bank of America didn't reveal the cause of its glitches, but both banks recently rolled out changes to their website that could have inadvertently caused a problem.

On blogs and Twitter, some hacker groups were claiming responsibility for the issues at both banks. The problems at both banks began soon after one group posted messages on Pastebin calling for attacks on the banks' sites. The website of the New York Stock Exchange, also mentioned as a target in Tuesday's message, did not suffer any apparent outages.

The favorite weapon for these kinds of cyberattacks is a "distributed denial of service" (DDoS) attack, which directs a flood of traffic to a website and temporarily crashes it by overwhelming its servers. It doesn't actually involve any hacking or security breaches. A DDoS attack would typically cause the type of slowness and intermittent unavailability that both Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Bank of America experienced this week.

But there was no immediate evidence to support the hackers' claims, and several recent ones turned out to be hoaxes. Earlier this month, a person affiliated with the hacktivist collective Anonymous said the group took down the web hosting service GoDaddy, and in June the group UGNazi claimed responsibility for downing Twitter. Both outages were later revealed to be technical issues.

"I can assure you we continuously take proactive measures to secure our systems," Bank of America's spokesman said on Tuesday in response to a question about whether the company had seen any signs of a cyberattack. Chase's spokesman declined to comment about the issue. To top of page

First Published: September 19, 2012: 6:03 PM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/bH4PTTecPsQ/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
15.35 | 0 komentar | Read More

Online poker exec pleads guilty in money laundering case

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A former online poker executive has pleaded guilty to laundering illegal gambling proceeds for the popular gaming sites Pokerstars and Full Tilt Poker, federal officials announced Wednesday.

Nelson Burtnick, 41, admitted that while serving as director of payments first at Pokerstars and then at Full Tilt, he helped deceive banks into processing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of gambling transactions in violation of federal law, the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office said in a statement.

The U.S. operations of Pokerstars and Full Tilt were shuttered last year after the companies were indicted on charges of bank fraud and money laundering. In July, the Justice Department announced a $731 million settlement with the firms to resolve the allegations. Full Tilt also settled allegations that it had operated a Ponzi scheme, failing to maintain sufficient funds on deposit for players to withdraw.

Under the settlement, Full Tilt agreed to forfeit virtually of all its assets to the government, with Pokerstars agreeing to acquire them and to repay Full Tilt players still owed money.

Burtnick, a Canadian national and resident of Ireland, faces a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison. His attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Five other defendants in the case have also pleaded guilty, with charges still pending against ex-Full Tilt CEO Raymond Bitar. To top of page

First Published: September 19, 2012: 4:56 PM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_technology/~3/MrmlWDw8Whg/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
14.22 | 0 komentar | Read More
Techie Blogger